Ryzen 5 3500X vs Xeon W-3265

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3265
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 205 Watt
19.46
+129%

Xeon W-3265 outperforms Ryzen 5 3500X by a whopping 129% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3265 and Ryzen 5 3500X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking298887
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.73no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon WAMD Ryzen 5
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)24 September 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,349no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3265 and Ryzen 5 3500X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads486
Base clock speed2.7 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier27no data
L1 cache1.5 MB384 KB
L2 cache24 MB3 MB
L3 cache33 MB32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Maximum core temperature78 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3265 and Ryzen 5 3500X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647AM4
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3265 and Ryzen 5 3500X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusLaunchedno data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3265 and Ryzen 5 3500X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3265 and Ryzen 5 3500X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3265 and Ryzen 5 3500X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size1 TB128 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/s51.196 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3265 and Ryzen 5 3500X.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes64no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3265 19.46
+129%
Ryzen 5 3500X 8.51

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3265 30105
+129%
Ryzen 5 3500X 13164

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.46 8.51
Recency 3 June 2019 24 September 2019
Physical cores 24 6
Threads 48 6
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon W-3265 has a 128.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

Ryzen 5 3500X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 215.4% lower power consumption.

The Xeon W-3265 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 3500X in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-3265 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 3500X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3265 and Ryzen 5 3500X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3265
Xeon W-3265
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
Ryzen 5 3500X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 11 votes

Rate Xeon W-3265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1758 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3500X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3265 or Ryzen 5 3500X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.