Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS vs Xeon W-3245M
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS outperforms Xeon W-3245M by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon W-3245M and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 361 | 268 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 13.89 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Xeon W | no data |
| Architecture codename | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 3 June 2019 (5 years ago) | 16 April 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $5,002 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon W-3245M and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 32 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 32 | no data |
| L1 cache | 1 MB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 16 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 22 MB | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 77 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 25,000 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon W-3245M and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | Socket P | FP7 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 205 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3245M and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon W-3245M and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3245M and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3245M and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 2 TiB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 6 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 140.8 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 780M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3245M and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 64 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 17.34 | 20.15 |
| Recency | 3 June 2019 | 16 April 2024 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 8 |
| Threads | 32 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 205 Watt | 45 Watt |
Xeon W-3245M has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS, on the other hand, has a 16.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 355.6% lower power consumption.
The Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-3245M in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon W-3245M is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3245M and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
