Xeon Platinum 8253 vs W-2150B

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-2150B
2017
10 cores / 20 threads, 120 Watt
12.91
Xeon Platinum 8253
2018
16 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
17.73
+37.3%

Xeon Platinum 8253 outperforms Xeon W-2150B by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-2150B and Xeon Platinum 8253 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking584345
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data8.23
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon WIntel Xeon Platinum
Power efficiency10.1813.42
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Cascade Lake-SP (2018)
Release date21 December 2017 (6 years ago)11 December 2018 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,115

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-2150B and Xeon Platinum 8253 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads2032
Base clock speed3 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3022
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache13.75 MB (shared)22 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size484 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data87 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)68 °C87 °C
Number of transistorsno data8,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-2150B and Xeon Platinum 8253 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)8 (Multiprocessor)
Socket2066FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-2150B and Xeon Platinum 8253. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon W-2150B and Xeon Platinum 8253 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-2150B and Xeon Platinum 8253 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-2150B and Xeon Platinum 8253. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size512 GB1 TB
Max memory channels46
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/s140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-2150B and Xeon Platinum 8253.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4848

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-2150B 12.91
Xeon Platinum 8253 17.73
+37.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-2150B 20510
Xeon Platinum 8253 28165
+37.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.91 17.73
Recency 21 December 2017 11 December 2018
Physical cores 10 16
Threads 20 32
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon W-2150B has 4.2% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8253, on the other hand, has a 37.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, and 60% more physical cores and 60% more threads.

The Xeon Platinum 8253 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-2150B in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-2150B and Xeon Platinum 8253, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-2150B
Xeon W-2150B
Intel Xeon Platinum 8253
Xeon Platinum 8253

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 29 votes

Rate Xeon W-2150B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Platinum 8253 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-2150B or Xeon Platinum 8253, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.