Celeron G3900T vs Xeon Silver 4114
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Silver 4114 outperforms Celeron G3900T by a whopping 549% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Silver 4114 and Celeron G3900T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 841 | 2174 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 27.63 | 0.84 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Xeon Silver | Intel Celeron |
| Architecture codename | Skylake (server) (2017−2019) | Skylake (2015−2016) |
| Release date | 11 July 2017 (6 years ago) | 19 October 2015 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $694 | no data |
| Current price | $70 (0.1x MSRP) | $36 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon Silver 4114 has 3189% better value for money than Celeron G3900T.
Detailed specifications
Xeon Silver 4114 and Celeron G3900T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 20 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Bus support | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 640 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 10 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 13.75 MB | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 98.57 mm210.3 mm × 9.57 mm |
| Maximum core temperature | 78 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Silver 4114 and Celeron G3900T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA3647 | FCLGA1151 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4114 and Celeron G3900T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
| TSX | + | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | no data | + |
| SIPP | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Xeon Silver 4114 and Celeron G3900T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | - |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| MPX | no data | - |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® ME |
| OS Guard | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4114 and Celeron G3900T are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4114 and Celeron G3900T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2400 | DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600 |
| Maximum memory size | 768 GB | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | 6 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 115.212 GB/s | 34.1 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics 510 |
| Max video memory | no data | 64 GB |
| Quick Sync Video | no data | + |
| Clear Video | no data | + |
| Clear Video HD | no data | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 950 MHz |
| InTru 3D | no data | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Xeon Silver 4114 and Celeron G3900T integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
| eDP | no data | + |
| DisplayPort | no data | + |
| HDMI | no data | + |
| DVI | no data | + |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon Silver 4114 and Celeron G3900T integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| 4K resolution support | no data | + |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4096x2304@24Hz |
| Max resolution over eDP | no data | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Max resolution over VGA | no data | N/A |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Xeon Silver 4114 and Celeron G3900T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | 12 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.4 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4114 and Celeron G3900T.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 48 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Xeon Silver 4114 outperforms Celeron G3900T by 549% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Xeon Silver 4114 outperforms Celeron G3900T by 548% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Xeon Silver 4114 outperforms Celeron G3900T by 55% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Xeon Silver 4114 outperforms Celeron G3900T by 441% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 8.50 | 1.31 |
| Recency | 11 July 2017 | 19 October 2015 |
| Physical cores | 10 | 2 |
| Threads | 20 | 2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 35 Watt |
The Xeon Silver 4114 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G3900T in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon Silver 4114 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron G3900T is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4114 and Celeron G3900T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
