Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs Xeon Silver 4106H
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Silver 4106H and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 321 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | no data | 38.65 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Hawk Point (2024) |
| Release date | 1 July 2018 (6 years ago) | 16 April 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon Silver 4106H and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 11 MB | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 178 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 25,000 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Silver 4106H and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FP7 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4106H and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon Silver 4106H and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4106H and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4106H and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2400 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 768 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 6 | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 780M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4106H and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 48 | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 July 2018 | 16 April 2024 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 45 Watt |
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has an age advantage of 5 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 88.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon Silver 4106H and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4106H and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
