Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U vs Xeon Platinum 8480+
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Platinum 8480+ and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 462 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | no data | 50.97 |
| Architecture codename | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) | Hawk Point (2024) |
| Release date | 10 January 2023 (1 year ago) | 16 April 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $10,710 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Xeon Platinum 8480+ and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 56 (Hexapentaconta-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 112 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80K (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 105 MB | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 4x 477 mm2 | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 79 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 25,000 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Platinum 8480+ and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | 4677 | FP7 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8480+ and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon Platinum 8480+ and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8480+ and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8480+ and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5-4800 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 780M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8480+ and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 80 | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 10 January 2023 | 16 April 2024 |
| Physical cores | 56 | 8 |
| Threads | 112 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 28 Watt |
Xeon Platinum 8480+ has 600% more physical cores and 600% more threads.
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 150% more advanced lithography process, and 1150% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon Platinum 8480+ and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8480+ and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
