EPYC 9354 vs Xeon Platinum 8351N

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8351N and EPYC 9354 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated47
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data10.45
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data14.78
Architecture codenameIce Lake-SP (2021)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date6 April 2021 (3 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,420

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8351N and EPYC 9354 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores3632 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads7264
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.25 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.8 GHz
Multiplierno data32.5
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache54 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data8x 72 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)76 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data52,560 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8351N and EPYC 9354 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA4189SP5
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8351N and EPYC 9354. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8351N and EPYC 9354 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8351N and EPYC 9354 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8351N and EPYC 9354. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size6 TB6 TiB
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8351N and EPYC 9354.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes64128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon Platinum 8351N 1617
EPYC 9354 1779
+10%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon Platinum 8351N 15233
+18.3%
EPYC 9354 12881

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 April 2021 10 November 2022
Physical cores 36 32
Threads 72 64
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 280 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8351N has 12.5% more physical cores and 12.5% more threads, and 24.4% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9354, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xeon Platinum 8351N and EPYC 9354. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8351N and EPYC 9354, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8351N
Xeon Platinum 8351N
AMD EPYC 9354
EPYC 9354

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8351N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate EPYC 9354 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8351N or EPYC 9354, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.