EPYC 9354 vs Xeon Platinum 8362

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8362
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 265 Watt
5.89
EPYC 9354
2022
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
43.86
+645%

EPYC 9354 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8362 by a whopping 645% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8362 and EPYC 9354 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking104944
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.9514.17
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameIce Lake-SP (2021)Genoa
Release date6 April 2021 (3 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,420
Current price$3719 $2895 (0.8x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 9354 has 627% better value for money than Xeon Platinum 8362.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8362 and EPYC 9354 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads6464
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3.25 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache48 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data8x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature82 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)81 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data52,560 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8362 and EPYC 9354 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketFCLGA4189SP5
Power consumption (TDP)265 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8362 and EPYC 9354. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8362 and EPYC 9354 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8362 and EPYC 9354 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8362 and EPYC 9354. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size6 TB6 TiB
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8362 and EPYC 9354.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes64128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8362 5.89
EPYC 9354 43.86
+645%

EPYC 9354 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8362 by 645% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Platinum 8362 9107
EPYC 9354 67842
+645%

EPYC 9354 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8362 by 645% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.89 43.86
Recency 6 April 2021 10 November 2022
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 265 Watt 280 Watt

The EPYC 9354 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Platinum 8362 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8362 and EPYC 9354, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8362
Xeon Platinum 8362
AMD EPYC 9354
EPYC 9354

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 2 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8362 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9354 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8362 or EPYC 9354, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.