Xeon Gold 5418Y vs Platinum 8260M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8260M
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 165 Watt
21.79
Xeon Gold 5418Y
2023
24 cores / 48 threads, 185 Watt
28.54
+31%

Xeon Gold 5418Y outperforms Xeon Platinum 8260M by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8260M and Xeon Gold 5418Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking251166
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.9354.43
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Platinumno data
Power efficiency12.2714.33
Architecture codenameCascade Lake-SP (2018−2019)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,705$1,493

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 5418Y has 1285% better value for money than Xeon Platinum 8260M.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8260M and Xeon Gold 5418Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads4848
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.8 GHz
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache1.5 MB80K (per core)
L2 cache24 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache35.75 MB (shared)45 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8260M and Xeon Gold 5418Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt185 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8260M and Xeon Gold 5418Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8260M and Xeon Gold 5418Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8260M and Xeon Gold 5418Y are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8260M and Xeon Gold 5418Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5-4400
Maximum memory size2 TB4 TB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8260M and Xeon Gold 5418Y.

PCIe version3.05
PCI Express lanes4880

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8260M 21.79
Xeon Gold 5418Y 28.54
+31%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8260M 33970
Xeon Gold 5418Y 44487
+31%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.79 28.54
Recency 2 April 2019 10 January 2023
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 185 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8260M has 12.1% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 5418Y, on the other hand, has a 31% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 3 years.

The Xeon Gold 5418Y is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Platinum 8260M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8260M and Xeon Gold 5418Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M
Xeon Platinum 8260M
Intel Xeon Gold 5418Y
Xeon Gold 5418Y

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 13 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8260M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5418Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8260M or Xeon Gold 5418Y, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.