Xeon Platinum 8358 vs Platinum 8260M

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon Platinum 8260M
2018
24 cores / 48 threads
21.96
Xeon Platinum 8358
2021
32 cores / 64 threads
35.18
+60.2%

Platinum 8358 outperforms Platinum 8260M by an impressive 60% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8260M and Xeon Platinum 8358 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking21390
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.94
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Platinumno data
Architecture codenameCascade Lake-SP (2019)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date11 December 2018 (5 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,705no data
Current price$14619 (1.9x MSRP)$6415

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Platinum 8260M and Xeon Platinum 8358 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8260M and Xeon Platinum 8358 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads4864
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache35.75 MB (shared)48 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °C81 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8260M and Xeon Platinum 8358 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt250 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8260M and Xeon Platinum 8358. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusLaunchedLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8260M and Xeon Platinum 8358 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8260M and Xeon Platinum 8358 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8260M and Xeon Platinum 8358. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size2 TB6 TB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8260M and Xeon Platinum 8358.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes4864

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8260M 21.96
Xeon Platinum 8358 35.18
+60.2%

Platinum 8358 outperforms Platinum 8260M by 60% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Platinum 8260M 33970
Xeon Platinum 8358 54416
+60.2%

Platinum 8358 outperforms Platinum 8260M by 60% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.96 35.18
Recency 11 December 2018 6 April 2021
Physical cores 24 32
Threads 48 64
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 250 Watt

The Xeon Platinum 8358 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Platinum 8260M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8260M and Xeon Platinum 8358, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M
Xeon Platinum 8260M
Intel Xeon Platinum 8358
Xeon Platinum 8358

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 13 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8260M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 7 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8358 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8260M or Xeon Platinum 8358, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.