EPYC 72F3 vs Xeon Platinum 8175M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8175M
24 cores / 48 threads
17.42

EPYC 72F3 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8175M by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8175M and EPYC 72F3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking384369
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.32
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon PlatinumAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data9.02
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Milan (2021−2023)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,468

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8175M and EPYC 72F3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads4816
Base clock speedno data3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz4.1 GHz
Multiplier2537
L1 cache1.5 MB512 KB
L2 cache24 MB4 MB
L3 cache33 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm+
Die sizeno data8x 81 mm2
Number of transistorsno data33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8175M and EPYC 72F3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketSocket PSP3
Power consumption (TDP)no data180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and EPYC 72F3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8175M and EPYC 72F3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and EPYC 72F3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and EPYC 72F3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size1,536 GB tdp=240 Watt4 TiB
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and EPYC 72F3.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes48128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8175M 17.42
EPYC 72F3 17.81
+2.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8175M 26659
EPYC 72F3 27252
+2.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.42 17.81
Physical cores 24 8
Threads 48 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm

Xeon Platinum 8175M has 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

EPYC 72F3, on the other hand, has a 2.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon Platinum 8175M and EPYC 72F3.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8175M and EPYC 72F3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8175M
Xeon Platinum 8175M
AMD EPYC 72F3
EPYC 72F3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 26 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8175M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 6 votes

Rate EPYC 72F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8175M or EPYC 72F3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.