i9-13900F vs Xeon MP 3.16

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon MP 3.16 and Core i9-13900F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated120
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data57.08
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Architecture codenamePotomac (2005)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release dateMarch 2005 (19 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$524

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon MP 3.16 and Core i9-13900F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads132
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.17 GHz5.5 GHz
L1 cache16 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors286 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon MP 3.16 and Core i9-13900F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket604FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon MP 3.16 and Core i9-13900F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Statusno dataLaunched
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon MP 3.16 and Core i9-13900F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon MP 3.16 and Core i9-13900F are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon MP 3.16 and Core i9-13900F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data192 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data89.6 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon MP 3.16 and Core i9-13900F.

PCIe versionno data5.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 24
Threads 1 32
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 65 Watt

i9-13900F has 2300% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and 107.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon MP 3.16 and Core i9-13900F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon MP 3.16 is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-13900F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon MP 3.16 and Core i9-13900F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon MP 3.16
Xeon MP 3.16
Intel Core i9-13900F
Core i9-13900F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon MP 3.16 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 116 votes

Rate Core i9-13900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon MP 3.16 or Core i9-13900F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.