Sempron 3400+ vs Xeon L5609

Primary details

Comparing Xeon L5609 and Sempron 3400+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1883not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency4.92no data
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Palermo (2001−2005)
Release date16 March 2010 (14 years ago)1 October 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$30

Detailed specifications

Xeon L5609 and Sempron 3400+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed1.86 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.86 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)128 KB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm90 nm
Die size239 mm2103 mm2
Maximum core temperature63 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,170 million63 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon L5609 and Sempron 3400+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366939
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt62 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L5609 and Sempron 3400+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon L5609 and Sempron 3400+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L5609 and Sempron 3400+ are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L5609 and Sempron 3400+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1
Maximum memory size288 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon L5609 and Sempron 3400+.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon L5609 3298
+1029%
Sempron 3400+ 292

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 March 2010 1 October 2005
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 62 Watt

Xeon L5609 has an age advantage of 4 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 181.3% more advanced lithography process, and 55% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon L5609 and Sempron 3400+. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon L5609 is a server/workstation processor while Sempron 3400+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon L5609 and Sempron 3400+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon L5609
Xeon L5609
AMD Sempron 3400+
Sempron 3400+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon L5609 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 16 votes

Rate Sempron 3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon L5609 or Sempron 3400+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.