Opteron 850 vs Xeon L5630
Primary details
Comparing Xeon L5630 and Opteron 850 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1963 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.10 | no data |
Market segment | Server | Server |
Power efficiency | 4.50 | no data |
Architecture codename | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) | SledgeHammer (2003−2005) |
Release date | 16 March 2010 (14 years ago) | December 2004 (19 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,100 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon L5630 and Opteron 850 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 8 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 2.13 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 12 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 130 nm |
Die size | 239 mm2 | 193 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 63 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 1,170 million | 106 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon L5630 and Opteron 850 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 8 |
Socket | FCLGA1366,LGA1366 | 940 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 89 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L5630 and Opteron 850. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
AES-NI | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | 1.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
PAE | 40 Bit | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon L5630 and Opteron 850 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L5630 and Opteron 850 are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L5630 and Opteron 850. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 288 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 3 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon L5630 and Opteron 850.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
Threads | 8 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 130 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 89 Watt |
Xeon L5630 has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 306.3% more advanced lithography process, and 122.5% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon L5630 and Opteron 850. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon L5630 and Opteron 850, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.