Apple M1 Max vs Xeon L5640

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon L5640
2010
6 cores / 12 threads, 60 Watt
2.98

Apple M1 Max outperforms Xeon L5640 by a whopping 294% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon L5640 and Apple M1 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1572621
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.27no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataApple M-Series
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)no data
Release date16 March 2010 (14 years ago)18 October 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$200no data
Current price$768 (3.8x MSRP)$8.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon L5640 and Apple M1 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads1210
Base clock speed2.26 GHz2.06 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz3.22 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)2.9 MB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)28 MB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)48 MB
Chip lithography32 nm5 nm
Die size239 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature69 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,170 million57000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon L5640 and Apple M1 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366no data
Power consumption (TDP)60 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L5640 and Apple M1 Max. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon L5640 and Apple M1 Max technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L5640 and Apple M1 Max are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L5640 and Apple M1 Max. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size288 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M1 Max 32-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon L5640 and Apple M1 Max.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon L5640 2.98
Apple M1 Max 11.75
+294%

Apple M1 Max outperforms Xeon L5640 by 294% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon L5640 4606
Apple M1 Max 22040
+379%

Apple M1 Max outperforms Xeon L5640 by 379% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.98 11.75
Recency 16 March 2010 18 October 2021
Physical cores 6 10
Threads 12 10
Chip lithography 32 nm 5 nm

The Apple M1 Max is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon L5640 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon L5640 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M1 Max is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon L5640 and Apple M1 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon L5640
Xeon L5640
Apple M1 Max
M1 Max

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 53 votes

Rate Xeon L5640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 672 votes

Rate Apple M1 Max on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon L5640 or Apple M1 Max, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.