Celeron E1600 vs Xeon L5520

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon L5520
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 60 Watt
1.47
+172%

Xeon L5520 outperforms Celeron E1600 by a whopping 172% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon L5520 and Celeron E1600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21502818
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.58no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Architecture codenameGainestown (2009−2010)Allendale (2006−2009)
Release date30 March 2009 (15 years ago)31 May 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$100no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon L5520 and Celeron E1600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed2.26 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.48 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB (shared)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size263 mm277 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °C73 °C
Number of transistors731 million105 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.5V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon L5520 and Celeron E1600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA1366LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L5520 and Celeron E1600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching+-
PAE40 Bitno data
FSB parityno data-
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon L5520 and Celeron E1600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L5520 and Celeron E1600 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L5520 and Celeron E1600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size144 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon L5520 and Celeron E1600.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon L5520 1.47
+172%
Celeron E1600 0.54

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon L5520 2274
+171%
Celeron E1600 840

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.47 0.54
Recency 30 March 2009 31 May 2009
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon L5520 has a 172.2% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 8.3% lower power consumption.

Celeron E1600, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months.

The Xeon L5520 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron E1600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon L5520 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron E1600 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon L5520 and Celeron E1600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon L5520
Xeon L5520
Intel Celeron E1600
Celeron E1600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 9 votes

Rate Xeon L5520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 5 votes

Rate Celeron E1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon L5520 or Celeron E1600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.