Core 2 Duo P8400 vs Xeon L5420

Aggregate performance score

Xeon L5420
2008
50 Watt
1.40
+155%

Xeon L5420 outperforms Core 2 Duo P8400 by a whopping 155% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon L5420 and Core 2 Duo P8400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22372838
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core 2 Duo
Power efficiency2.552.01
Architecture codenameno dataPenryn (2008−2011)
Release date1 January 2008 (16 years ago)15 July 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$209

Detailed specifications

Xeon L5420 and Core 2 Duo P8400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data2 (Dual-core)
Threadsno data2
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.26 GHz
Boost clock speedno data2.26 GHz
Bus rateno data1066 MHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cacheno data3 MB
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cache3 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data107 mm2
Maximum core temperature57 °C105 °C
Number of transistorsno data410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.35V1.05V-1.15V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon L5420 and Core 2 Duo P8400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketLGA771BGA479,PBGA479,PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L5420 and Core 2 Duo P8400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching+-
FSB parity+-

Security technologies

Xeon L5420 and Core 2 Duo P8400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L5420 and Core 2 Duo P8400 are enumerated here.

VT-x++
EPT-no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon L5420 1.40
+155%
Core 2 Duo P8400 0.55

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon L5420 2143
+152%
Core 2 Duo P8400 849

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon L5420 332
+18.6%
Core 2 Duo P8400 280

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon L5420 917
+95.9%
Core 2 Duo P8400 468

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.40 0.55
Recency 1 January 2008 15 July 2008
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 25 Watt

Xeon L5420 has a 154.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Core 2 Duo P8400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, and 100% lower power consumption.

The Xeon L5420 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo P8400 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon L5420 is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Duo P8400 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon L5420 and Core 2 Duo P8400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon L5420
Xeon L5420
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400
Core 2 Duo P8400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 149 votes

Rate Xeon L5420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 84 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo P8400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon L5420 or Core 2 Duo P8400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.