Opteron 6386 SE vs Xeon Gold 6138

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6138
2017
20 cores / 40 threads, 125 Watt
15.85
+192%

Xeon Gold 6138 outperforms Opteron 6386 SE by a whopping 192% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6138 and Opteron 6386 SE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4531181
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.730.45
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Goldno data
Power efficiency11.563.53
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Abu Dhabi (2012)
Release date25 April 2017 (7 years ago)5 November 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,612$2,408

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 6138 has 951% better value for money than Opteron 6386 SE.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6138 and Opteron 6386 SE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores20 (Icosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads4016
Base clock speed2 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache1.25 MB768 KB
L2 cache20 MB16 MB
L3 cache27.5 MB8 MB (per die)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data315 mm2
Maximum core temperature86 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data2,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6138 and Opteron 6386 SE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)4
SocketFCLGA3647G34
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt140 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6138 and Opteron 6386 SE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6138 and Opteron 6386 SE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6138 and Opteron 6386 SE are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6138 and Opteron 6386 SE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR3
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6138 and Opteron 6386 SE.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6138 15.85
+192%
Opteron 6386 SE 5.42

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6138 24264
+193%
Opteron 6386 SE 8291

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.85 5.42
Recency 25 April 2017 5 November 2012
Physical cores 20 16
Threads 40 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 140 Watt

Xeon Gold 6138 has a 192.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 25% more physical cores and 150% more threads, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 12% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Gold 6138 is our recommended choice as it beats the Opteron 6386 SE in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6138 and Opteron 6386 SE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6138
Xeon Gold 6138
AMD Opteron 6386 SE
Opteron 6386 SE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 137 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6138 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 10 votes

Rate Opteron 6386 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6138 or Opteron 6386 SE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.