Xeon Platinum 8163 vs Opteron 6386 SE
Primary details
Comparing Opteron 6386 SE and Xeon Platinum 8163 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1184 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.44 | no data |
Market segment | Server | Server |
Series | no data | Intel Xeon Platinum |
Power efficiency | 3.53 | no data |
Architecture codename | Abu Dhabi (2012) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
Release date | 5 November 2012 (12 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,408 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Opteron 6386 SE and Xeon Platinum 8163 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
Threads | 16 | 48 |
Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
Multiplier | no data | 25 |
L1 cache | 768 KB | 1.5 MB |
L2 cache | 16 MB | 24 MB |
L3 cache | 8 MB (per die) | 33 MB |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | 315 mm2 | no data |
Number of transistors | 2,400 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 6386 SE and Xeon Platinum 8163 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 4 | 8 (Multiprocessor) |
Socket | G34 | Socket P |
Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | no data |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6386 SE and Xeon Platinum 8163. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | + | - |
AVX | + | + |
vPro | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Opteron 6386 SE and Xeon Platinum 8163 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6386 SE and Xeon Platinum 8163 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6386 SE and Xeon Platinum 8163. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4-2666 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 768 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 6 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 128.001 GB/s |
ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6386 SE and Xeon Platinum 8163.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 48 |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 16 | 24 |
Threads | 16 | 48 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
Xeon Platinum 8163 has 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Opteron 6386 SE and Xeon Platinum 8163. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 6386 SE and Xeon Platinum 8163, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.