Ryzen 7 7840S vs Xeon E7-8895 v2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E7-8895 v2
2014
15 cores / 30 threads, 155 Watt
36.96
+132%

Xeon E7-8895 v2 outperforms Ryzen 7 7840S by a whopping 132% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E7-8895 v2 and Ryzen 7 7840S processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking84399
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation100.00no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataPhoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Architecture codenameno dataPhoenix-HS (Zen 4)
Release date1 January 2014 (10 years ago)5 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price$44 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E7-8895 v2 and Ryzen 7 7840S basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores15 (Pentadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads3016
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cacheno data512 KB
L2 cacheno data8 MB
L3 cache37.5 MB16 MB
Chip lithography22 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperature67 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E7-8895 v2 and Ryzen 7 7840S compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8no data
Socketno dataFP7/FP7r2/FP8
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E7-8895 v2 and Ryzen 7 7840S. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Instruction Replay-no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E7-8895 v2 and Ryzen 7 7840S technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E7-8895 v2 and Ryzen 7 7840S are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E7-8895 v2 and Ryzen 7 7840S. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600DDR5
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E7-8895 v2 and Ryzen 7 7840S.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes32no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E7-8895 v2 36.96
+132%
Ryzen 7 7840S 15.93

Xeon E7-8895 v2 outperforms Ryzen 7 7840S by 132% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E7-8895 v2 57165
+132%
Ryzen 7 7840S 24635

Xeon E7-8895 v2 outperforms Ryzen 7 7840S by 132% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 36.96 15.93
Recency 1 January 2014 5 January 2023
Physical cores 15 8
Threads 30 16
Chip lithography 22 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 35 Watt

The Xeon E7-8895 v2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 7840S in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E7-8895 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 7840S is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E7-8895 v2 and Ryzen 7 7840S, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E7-8895 v2
Xeon E7-8895 v2
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S
Ryzen 7 7840S

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 104 votes

Rate Xeon E7-8895 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 6 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7840S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E7-8895 v2 or Ryzen 7 7840S, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.