Celeron P4600 vs Xeon E5607

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5607
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 80 Watt
1.74
+222%

Xeon E5607 outperforms Celeron P4600 by a whopping 222% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5607 and Celeron P4600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking19472746
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.14no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Westmere (2010−2011)
Release date14 February 2011 (13 years ago)28 March 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$135no data
Current price$444 (3.3x MSRP)$66

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5607 and Celeron P4600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.26 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed0.27 GHz0.1 GHz
Bus supportno data1 × 2.5 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size239 mm281 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors1,170 million382 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5607 and Celeron P4600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366PGA988
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5607 and Celeron P4600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
FMAno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bit36 Bit
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon E5607 and Celeron P4600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5607 and Celeron P4600 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5607 and Celeron P4600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-800, DDR3-1066
Maximum memory size288 GB8 GB
Max memory channels32
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s17.1 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors
Clear Videono data+
Graphics max frequencyno data667 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5607 and Celeron P4600 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5607 and Celeron P4600.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5607 1.74
+222%
Celeron P4600 0.54

Xeon E5607 outperforms Celeron P4600 by 222% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5607 2686
+223%
Celeron P4600 832

Xeon E5607 outperforms Celeron P4600 by 223% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.74 0.54
Recency 14 February 2011 28 March 2010
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 35 Watt

The Xeon E5607 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron P4600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5607 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron P4600 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5607 and Celeron P4600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5607
Xeon E5607
Intel Celeron P4600
Celeron P4600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 4 votes

Rate Xeon E5607 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 11 votes

Rate Celeron P4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5607 or Celeron P4600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.