Celeron M U3400 vs Xeon E5540
Aggregate performance score
Xeon E5540 outperforms Celeron M U3400 by a whopping 503% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E5540 and Celeron M U3400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2023 | 3106 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.64 | no data |
Market segment | Server | Laptop |
Series | no data | Intel Celeron M |
Power efficiency | 2.07 | 1.52 |
Architecture codename | Gainestown (2009−2010) | Arrandale (2010−2011) |
Release date | 30 March 2009 (15 years ago) | 24 May 2010 (14 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $30 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5540 and Celeron M U3400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 8 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 2.53 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 1.06 GHz |
Bus rate | no data | 2500 MHz |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512 KB |
L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 2 MB |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
Die size | 263 mm2 | 81+114 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 76 °C | 105 °C |
Number of transistors | 731 million | 382+177 Million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5540 and Celeron M U3400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
Socket | FCLGA1366 | BGA1288 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 18 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5540 and Celeron M U3400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | 1.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Idle States | + | + |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
PAE | 40 Bit | no data |
Fast Memory Access | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon E5540 and Celeron M U3400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5540 and Celeron M U3400 are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5540 and Celeron M U3400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum memory size | 144 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 3 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5540 and Celeron M U3400.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 1.75 | 0.29 |
Recency | 30 March 2009 | 24 May 2010 |
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Threads | 8 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 18 Watt |
Xeon E5540 has a 503.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
Celeron M U3400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 344.4% lower power consumption.
The Xeon E5540 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M U3400 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon E5540 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron M U3400 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5540 and Celeron M U3400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.