Celeron M U3400 vs Xeon E5540

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5540
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
1.75
+503%
Celeron M U3400
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.29

Xeon E5540 outperforms Celeron M U3400 by a whopping 503% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5540 and Celeron M U3400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20233106
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.64no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron M
Power efficiency2.071.52
Architecture codenameGainestown (2009−2010)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date30 March 2009 (15 years ago)24 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$30no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5540 and Celeron M U3400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed2.53 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz1.06 GHz
Bus rateno data2500 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size263 mm281+114 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °C105 °C
Number of transistors731 million382+177 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5540 and Celeron M U3400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA1366BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5540 and Celeron M U3400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5540 and Celeron M U3400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5540 and Celeron M U3400 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5540 and Celeron M U3400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size144 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5540 and Celeron M U3400.

PCIe version2.0no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.75 0.29
Recency 30 March 2009 24 May 2010
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 18 Watt

Xeon E5540 has a 503.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Celeron M U3400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 344.4% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5540 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M U3400 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5540 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron M U3400 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5540 and Celeron M U3400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5540
Xeon E5540
Intel Celeron M U3400
Celeron M U3400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 16 votes

Rate Xeon E5540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 4 votes

Rate Celeron M U3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5540 or Celeron M U3400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.