Xeon X5482 vs E5540
Aggregated performance score
E5540 outperforms X5482 by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
Comparing Xeon E5540 and Xeon X5482 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 1882 | 1889 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Value for money | 3.05 | 0.30 |
Market segment | Server | Server |
Architecture codename | Gainestown (2009−2010) | no data |
Release date | March 2009 (15 years old) | 1 October 2007 (16 years old) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $30 | no data |
Current price | $160 (5.3x MSRP) | $211 |
Value for money
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon E5540 has 917% better value for money than Xeon X5482.
Technical specs
Xeon E5540 and Xeon X5482 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | no data |
Threads | 8 | no data |
Base clock speed | 2.53 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | no data |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | no data |
L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 12 MB L2 Cache |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Die size | 263 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 76 °C | 63 °C |
Number of transistors | 731 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
VID voltage range | no data | 0.85V-1.35V |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5540 and Xeon X5482 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
Socket | FCLGA1366 | LGA771 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 150 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5540 and Xeon X5482. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | 1.0 | - |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
Idle States | + | + |
Thermal Monitoring | no data | + |
Demand Based Switching | + | + |
PAE | 40 Bit | no data |
FSB parity | no data | + |
Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Xeon E5540 and Xeon X5482 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | - |
EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5540 and Xeon X5482 are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5540 and Xeon X5482. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 144 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 3 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
E5540 outperforms X5482 by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
E5540 outperforms X5482 by 1% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
X5482 outperforms E5540 by 17% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
E5540 outperforms X5482 by 16% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score | 1.82 | 1.80 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 150 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Xeon E5540 and Xeon X5482. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5540 and Xeon X5482, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.