Atom N270 vs Xeon E5450

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5450
2007
4 cores / 4 threads, 80 Watt
1.60
+1900%
Atom N270
2008
1 core / 2 threads, 2 Watt
0.08

Xeon E5450 outperforms Atom N270 by a whopping 1900% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22503557
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.11no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Power efficiency1.933.09
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameHarpertown (2007−2008)DiamondVille (2008−2009)
Release date11 November 2007 (17 years ago)2 April 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$915$44

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5450 and Atom N270 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz0.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rateno data533.33 MT/s
Multiplierno data12
L1 cache64 KB (per core)56 KB
L2 cache6 MB (per die)512 KB
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size2x 107 mm225.9638 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)63 °Cno data
Number of transistors820 million47 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.35V0.9V-1.1625V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5450 and Atom N270 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21 (Uniprocessor)
SocketLGA771PBGA437
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt2.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5450 and Atom N270. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE, Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching+-
FSB parity+-

Security technologies

Xeon E5450 and Atom N270 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5450 and Atom N270 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x+-
EPT-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5450 and Atom N270. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboardno data
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/A-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5450 and Atom N270.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon E5450 1.60
+1900%
Atom N270 0.08

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon E5450 2571
+1790%
Atom N270 136

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.60 0.08
Recency 11 November 2007 2 April 2008
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 2 Watt

Xeon E5450 has a 1900% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Atom N270, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, and 3900% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon E5450 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom N270 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5450 is a server/workstation processor while Atom N270 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5450
Xeon E5450
Intel Atom N270
Atom N270

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1355 votes

Rate Xeon E5450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 259 votes

Rate Atom N270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon E5450 and Atom N270, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.