Celeron Dual-Core T3100 vs Xeon E5405

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5405
2007
80 Watt
1.11
+46.1%
Celeron Dual-Core T3100
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.76

Xeon E5405 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T3100 by a considerable 46% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5405 and Celeron Dual-Core T3100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking23002554
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.16no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron Dual-Core
Architecture codenameno dataPenryn (2008−2011)
Release date1 October 2007 (16 years ago)1 September 2009 (14 years ago)
Current price$37 $32

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5405 and Celeron Dual-Core T3100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data2 (Dual-core)
Threadsno data2
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1.9 GHz
Bus supportno data800 MHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data107 mm2
Maximum core temperature67 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range0.85V-1.35Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5405 and Celeron Dual-Core T3100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketLGA771BGA479, PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5405 and Celeron Dual-Core T3100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5405 and Celeron Dual-Core T3100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5405 and Celeron Dual-Core T3100 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data
EPT-no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5405 1.11
+46.1%
Celeron Dual-Core T3100 0.76

Xeon E5405 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T3100 by 46% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5405 1718
+46.3%
Celeron Dual-Core T3100 1174

Xeon E5405 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T3100 by 46% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.11 0.76
Recency 1 October 2007 1 September 2009
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 35 Watt

The Xeon E5405 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron Dual-Core T3100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5405 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron Dual-Core T3100 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5405 and Celeron Dual-Core T3100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5405
Xeon E5405
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3100
Celeron Dual-Core T3100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 31 vote

Rate Xeon E5405 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 32 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5405 or Celeron Dual-Core T3100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.