Ryzen 7 7840HS vs Xeon E5-4620 v3

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-4620 v3
2015
10 cores / 20 threads, 105 Watt
6.88
Ryzen 7 7840HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
18.89
+175%

Ryzen 7 7840HS outperforms Xeon E5-4620 v3 by a whopping 175% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-4620 v3 and Ryzen 7 7840HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1027329
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency5.9749.21
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
Release date1 June 2015 (9 years ago)January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-4620 v3 and Ryzen 7 7840HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2016
Base clock speed2 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache25 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm4 nm
Die size356 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)78 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,600 million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-4620 v3 and Ryzen 7 7840HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration41
SocketFCLGA2011FP8
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-4620 v3 and Ryzen 7 7840HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-4620 v3 and Ryzen 7 7840HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-4620 v3 and Ryzen 7 7840HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-4620 v3 and Ryzen 7 7840HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-4620 v3 and Ryzen 7 7840HS.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes4020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-4620 v3 6.88
Ryzen 7 7840HS 18.89
+175%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-4620 v3 10525
Ryzen 7 7840HS 28905
+175%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.88 18.89
Physical cores 10 8
Threads 20 16
Chip lithography 22 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon E5-4620 v3 has 25% more physical cores and 25% more threads.

Ryzen 7 7840HS, on the other hand, has a 174.6% higher aggregate performance score, a 450% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 7840HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-4620 v3 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-4620 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 7840HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-4620 v3 and Ryzen 7 7840HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-4620 v3
Xeon E5-4620 v3
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
Ryzen 7 7840HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 22 votes

Rate Xeon E5-4620 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 1607 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-4620 v3 or Ryzen 7 7840HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.