Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS vs Xeon E5-2699A v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2699A v4
2016
22 cores / 44 threads, 145 Watt
16.40
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
18.21
+11%

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2699A v4 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking375307
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.48no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E5AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)
Release date25 October 2016 (7 years ago)13 June 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,938no data
Current price$560 (0.1x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2699A v4 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores22 (Docosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads4416
Base clock speed2.4 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz5.2 GHz
Bus support2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
L1 cacheno data512 KB
L2 cache5.5 MB8 MB
L3 cache55 MB16 MB
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die size456.12 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors7200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2699A v4 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA2011FP7/FP8
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2699A v4 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2699A v4 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2699A v4 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2699A v4 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400no data
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2699A v4 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2699A v4 16.40
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 18.21
+11%

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 by 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2699A v4 25363
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 28170
+11.1%

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 by 11% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-2699A v4 1190
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 2299
+93.2%

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 by 93% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-2699A v4 9642
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 11038
+14.5%

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 by 14% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.40 18.21
Recency 25 October 2016 13 June 2023
Physical cores 22 8
Threads 44 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 35 Watt

The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2699A v4 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2699A v4 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2699A v4 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
Xeon E5-2699A v4
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 37 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2699A v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 37 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2699A v4 or Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.