Opteron 6272 vs Xeon E5-2696 v4

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2696 v4
2016
22 cores / 44 threads, 150 Watt
15.65
+374%
Opteron 6272
2011
16 cores / 16 threads, 115 Watt
3.30

Xeon E5-2696 v4 outperforms Opteron 6272 by a whopping 374% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Opteron 6272 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4321578
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.23
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency9.872.72
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Interlagos (2011−2012)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)14 November 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$325

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Opteron 6272 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores22 (Docosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads4416
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier22no data
L1 cacheno data768 KB (shared)
L2 cache5.5 MB8.00391 MB (per core)
L3 cache55 MB16 MB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size456.12 mm2316 mm2
Number of transistors7200 Million2,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Opteron 6272 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
Socketno dataG34
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt115 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Opteron 6272. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Opteron 6272 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Opteron 6272 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Opteron 6272. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory size1,536 GBno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Opteron 6272.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2696 v4 15.65
+374%
Opteron 6272 3.30

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2696 v4 24862
+374%
Opteron 6272 5240

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.65 3.30
Recency 20 June 2016 14 November 2011
Physical cores 22 16
Threads 44 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 115 Watt

Xeon E5-2696 v4 has a 374.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 37.5% more physical cores and 175% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Opteron 6272, on the other hand, has 30.4% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2696 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Opteron 6272 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Opteron 6272, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2696 v4
Xeon E5-2696 v4
AMD Opteron 6272
Opteron 6272

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 356 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2696 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 9 votes

Rate Opteron 6272 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2696 v4 or Opteron 6272, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.