Ryzen Threadripper 3990X vs Xeon E5-2689
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X outperforms Xeon E5-2689 by a whopping 705% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E5-2689 and Ryzen Threadripper 3990X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1069 | 34 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 9.21 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | Xeon | AMD Ryzen Threadripper |
| Power efficiency | 5.14 | 17.00 |
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| Release date | 6 March 2012 (12 years ago) | 7 February 2020 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $3,999 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5-2689 and Ryzen Threadripper 3990X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 128 |
| Base clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 29 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 20 MB (shared) | 256 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Die size | 435 mm2 | 74 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 2,270 million | 3,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5-2689 and Ryzen Threadripper 3990X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | 2011 | TR4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 280 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2689 and Ryzen Threadripper 3990X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon E5-2689 and Ryzen Threadripper 3990X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2689 and Ryzen Threadripper 3990X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2689 and Ryzen Threadripper 3990X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 256 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 102.403 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2689 and Ryzen Threadripper 3990X.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 40 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 6.25 | 50.29 |
| Recency | 6 March 2012 | 7 February 2020 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 64 |
| Threads | 16 | 128 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 280 Watt |
Xeon E5-2689 has 143.5% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X, on the other hand, has a 704.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.
The Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2689 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon E5-2689 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2689 and Ryzen Threadripper 3990X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
