Xeon 5148 vs E5-2680 v2

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2680 v2 and Xeon 5148 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	933	2809
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.11	3.05
Market segment	Server	Server
Power efficiency	6.56	1.35
Architecture codename	Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)	Woodcrest (2006)
Release date	1 September 2013 (11 years ago)	June 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,260	$9

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon 5148 has 45% better value for money than Xeon E5-2680 v2.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2680 v2 and Xeon 5148 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	10 (Deca-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	20	2
Base clock speed	2.8 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	3.6 GHz	2.33 GHz
Bus rate	8 GT/s	no data
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	0 KB
L2 cache	256 KB (per core)	4 MB
L3 cache	25 MB (shared)	0 KB
Chip lithography	22 nm	65 nm
Die size	160 mm2	no data
Maximum core temperature	82 °C	no data
Number of transistors	1,400 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2680 v2 and Xeon 5148 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	2	1
Socket	FCLGA2011	771
Power consumption (TDP)	115 Watt	40 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2680 v2 and Xeon 5148. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® AVX	no data
AES-NI	+	-
AVX	+	-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	2.0	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Flex Memory Access	-	no data
Demand Based Switching	+	no data
PAE	46 Bit	no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2680 v2 and Xeon 5148 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	no data
EDB	+	no data
Secure Key	+	no data
OS Guard	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2680 v2 and Xeon 5148 are enumerated here.

VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	no data
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2680 v2 and Xeon 5148. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR2
Maximum memory size	768 GB	no data
Max memory channels	4	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	59.7 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	+	-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2680 v2 and Xeon 5148.

PCIe version	3.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	40	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	7.97	0.57
Physical cores	10	2
Threads	20	2
Chip lithography	22 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	115 Watt	40 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2680 v2 and Xeon 5148, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---