Core 2 Duo SU9400 vs Xeon E5-2660 v3

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2660 v3 and Core 2 Duo SU9400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking906not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core 2 Duo
Power efficiency7.44no data
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)20 August 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$262

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2660 v3 and Core 2 Duo SU9400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads202
Base clock speed2.6 GHz1.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz1.4 GHz
Bus rate9.6 GT/s800 MHz
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)3 MB
L3 cache25 MB (shared)3 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die size356 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature79 °C105 °C
Number of transistors2,600 million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.05V-1.15V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2660 v3 and Core 2 Duo SU9400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA2011BGA956
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2660 v3 and Core 2 Duo SU9400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+-
PAE46 Bitno data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2660 v3 and Core 2 Duo SU9400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2660 v3 and Core 2 Duo SU9400 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2660 v3 and Core 2 Duo SU9400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133no data
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2660 v3 and Core 2 Duo SU9400.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2660 v3 13120
+2468%
Core 2 Duo SU9400 511

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 September 2014 20 August 2008
Physical cores 10 2
Threads 20 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 10 Watt

Xeon E5-2660 v3 has an age advantage of 6 years, 400% more physical cores and 900% more threads, and a 104.5% more advanced lithography process.

Core 2 Duo SU9400, on the other hand, has 950% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2660 v3 and Core 2 Duo SU9400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2660 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Duo SU9400 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2660 v3 and Core 2 Duo SU9400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3
Xeon E5-2660 v3
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400
Core 2 Duo SU9400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 1682 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2660 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 8 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo SU9400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2660 v3 or Core 2 Duo SU9400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.