Athlon Neo X2 L335 vs Core 2 Duo SU9400

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo SU9400 and Athlon Neo X2 L335 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 Duo2x AMD Athlon Neo
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Congo (2009)
Release date20 August 2008 (16 years ago)1 October 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$262no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo SU9400 and Athlon Neo X2 L335 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz800 MHz
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache3 MB512 KB
L3 cache3 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C95 °C
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.05V-1.15Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo SU9400 and Athlon Neo X2 L335 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA956ASB1 BGA
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo SU9400 and Athlon Neo X2 L335. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataHT 3.0, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo SU9400 and Athlon Neo X2 L335 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo SU9400 and Athlon Neo X2 L335 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo SU9400 and Athlon Neo X2 L335. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo SU9400 511
Athlon Neo X2 L335 529
+3.5%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Core 2 Duo SU9400 1596
+19.9%
Athlon Neo X2 L335 1331

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Core 2 Duo SU9400 2879
+12.3%
Athlon Neo X2 L335 2565

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Duo SU9400 1197
+3.6%
Athlon Neo X2 L335 1155

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Core 2 Duo SU9400 59.3
+66.1%
Athlon Neo X2 L335 98.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 August 2008 1 October 2009
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 18 Watt

Core 2 Duo SU9400 has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 80% lower power consumption.

Athlon Neo X2 L335, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo SU9400 and Athlon Neo X2 L335. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo SU9400 and Athlon Neo X2 L335, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400
Core 2 Duo SU9400
AMD Athlon Neo X2 L335
Athlon Neo X2 L335

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 8 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo SU9400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 3 votes

Rate Athlon Neo X2 L335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo SU9400 or Athlon Neo X2 L335, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.