Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 vs Xeon E5-2640

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2640
2012
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
4.10
+607%
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.58

Xeon E5-2640 outperforms Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 by a whopping 607% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2640 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13942791
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.77no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno data2x AMD Turion Ultra
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Puma (2008−2009)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)4 June 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$162no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2640 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed2.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus rate7.2 GT/s4400 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache15360 KB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size435 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,270 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2640 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011S1g2
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2640 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR2
Maximum memory size384 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.10 0.58
Recency 6 March 2012 4 June 2008
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon E5-2640 has a 606.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85, on the other hand, has 171.4% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2640 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2640 is a server/workstation processor while Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2640 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2640
Xeon E5-2640
AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1086 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 6 votes

Rate Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2640 or Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.