Celeron 1007U vs Xeon E5-2640 v3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2640 v3
2014
8 cores / 16 threads, 90 Watt
7.18
+1230%

Xeon E5-2640 v3 outperforms Celeron 1007U by a whopping 1230% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2640 v3 and Celeron 1007U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking9252742
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.07no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date8 September 2014 (9 years ago)20 January 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$86
Current price$29 $205 (2.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2640 v3 and Celeron 1007U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed2.6 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz1.5 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Die size356 mm2118 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data105 °C
Number of transistors2,600 million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2640 v3 and Celeron 1007U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011FCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2640 v3 and Celeron 1007U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
AVX+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX-no data
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-+
Demand Based Switching+-
PAE46 Bitno data
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2640 v3 and Celeron 1007U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection-no data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2640 v3 and Celeron 1007U are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2640 v3 and Celeron 1007U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866DDR3
Maximum memory size768 GB32 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth59 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2640 v3 and Celeron 1007U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2640 v3 and Celeron 1007U.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2640 v3 7.18
+1230%
Celeron 1007U 0.54

Xeon E5-2640 v3 outperforms Celeron 1007U by 1230% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2640 v3 11111
+1229%
Celeron 1007U 836

Xeon E5-2640 v3 outperforms Celeron 1007U by 1229% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-2640 v3 1043
+317%
Celeron 1007U 250

Xeon E5-2640 v3 outperforms Celeron 1007U by 317% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-2640 v3 5404
+1169%
Celeron 1007U 426

Xeon E5-2640 v3 outperforms Celeron 1007U by 1169% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.18 0.54
Recency 8 September 2014 20 January 2013
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 2
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 17 Watt

The Xeon E5-2640 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 1007U in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2640 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron 1007U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2640 v3 and Celeron 1007U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
Xeon E5-2640 v3
Intel Celeron 1007U
Celeron 1007U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 2620 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2640 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 112 votes

Rate Celeron 1007U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2640 v3 or Celeron 1007U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.