Pentium 967 vs Xeon E5-1620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1620 and Pentium 967 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1397not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.22no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Pentium
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-E (2011−2013)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release dateMarch 2012 (12 years ago)3 October 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$313$134
Current price$70 (0.2x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1620 and Pentium 967 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.6 GHz1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz1.3 GHz
Bus supportno data4 × 5 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache10240 KB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size294 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperature64 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1270 million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1620 and Pentium 967 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA2011FCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1620 and Pentium 967. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMAno data+
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-+
Demand Based Switching+-
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1620 and Pentium 967 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Identity Protection-no data
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1620 and Pentium 967 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1620 and Pentium 967. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size375 GB16 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s21.3 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-1620 and Pentium 967 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
eDPno data+
DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1620 and Pentium 967.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-1620 5858
+811%
Pentium 967 643

Xeon E5-1620 outperforms Pentium 967 by 811% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-1620 604
+168%
Pentium 967 225

Xeon E5-1620 outperforms Pentium 967 by 168% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-1620 2243
+425%
Pentium 967 427

Xeon E5-1620 outperforms Pentium 967 by 425% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Cost $313 $134
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 17 Watt

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-1620 and Pentium 967. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-1620 is a server/workstation processor while Pentium 967 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-1620 and Pentium 967, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-1620
Xeon E5-1620
Intel Pentium 967
Pentium 967

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 161 vote

Rate Xeon E5-1620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.7 6 votes

Rate Pentium 967 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-1620 or Pentium 967, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.