Core i9-9900T vs Xeon E3-1505M v5

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon E3-1505M v5
2015
4 cores / 8 threads
4.49

Core i9-9900T outperforms Xeon E3-1505M v5 by 90% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1505M v5 and Core i9-9900T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1238814
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.268.18
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E3Intel Core i9
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
Release date1 September 2015 (8 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$434$439
Current price$1888 (4.4x MSRP)$482 (1.1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-9900T has 3046% better value for money than Xeon E3-1505M v5.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1505M v5 and Core i9-9900T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.4 GHz
L1 cache256 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size122 mm2180.3 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1505M v5 and Core i9-9900T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1440FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1505M v5 and Core i9-9900T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP++
Smart Response+no data
StatusLaunchedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1505M v5 and Core i9-9900T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX++
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® MEYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1505M v5 and Core i9-9900T are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1505M v5 and Core i9-9900T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.1 GB/s41.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics P530Intel UHD Graphics 630
Max video memory1.7 GB64 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz1.2 GHz
InTru 3D++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1505M v5 and Core i9-9900T integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E3-1505M v5 and Core i9-9900T integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support++
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hz4096 x 2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hz4096 x 2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hz4096 x 2304@60Hz
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E3-1505M v5 and Core i9-9900T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.44.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1505M v5 and Core i9-9900T.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1505M v5 4.49
i9-9900T 8.55
+90.4%

Core i9-9900T outperforms Xeon E3-1505M v5 by 90% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E3-1505M v5 6946
i9-9900T 13224
+90.4%

Core i9-9900T outperforms Xeon E3-1505M v5 by 90% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E3-1505M v5 1167
i9-9900T 1433
+22.8%

Core i9-9900T outperforms Xeon E3-1505M v5 by 23% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E3-1505M v5 3566
i9-9900T 5994
+68.1%

Core i9-9900T outperforms Xeon E3-1505M v5 by 68% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Xeon E3-1505M v5 5560
i9-9900T 6758
+21.5%

Core i9-9900T outperforms Xeon E3-1505M v5 by 22% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Xeon E3-1505M v5 21436
i9-9900T 31357
+46.3%

Core i9-9900T outperforms Xeon E3-1505M v5 by 46% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Xeon E3-1505M v5 7024
i9-9900T 10259
+46.1%

Core i9-9900T outperforms Xeon E3-1505M v5 by 46% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Xeon E3-1505M v5 7.8
i9-9900T 5.88
+32.7%

Xeon E3-1505M v5 outperforms Core i9-9900T by 33% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Xeon E3-1505M v5 8
i9-9900T 12
+56.5%

Core i9-9900T outperforms Xeon E3-1505M v5 by 57% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Xeon E3-1505M v5 725
i9-9900T 1112
+53.5%

Core i9-9900T outperforms Xeon E3-1505M v5 by 53% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Xeon E3-1505M v5 158
i9-9900T 185
+17.5%

Core i9-9900T outperforms Xeon E3-1505M v5 by 17% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Xeon E3-1505M v5 1.78
i9-9900T 2.09
+17.4%

Core i9-9900T outperforms Xeon E3-1505M v5 by 17% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Xeon E3-1505M v5 4
i9-9900T 4.6
+16.5%

Core i9-9900T outperforms Xeon E3-1505M v5 by 16% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Xeon E3-1505M v5 3846
i9-9900T 6109
+58.8%

Core i9-9900T outperforms Xeon E3-1505M v5 by 59% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Xeon E3-1505M v5 166
i9-9900T 173
+4.5%

Core i9-9900T outperforms Xeon E3-1505M v5 by 4% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Xeon E3-1505M v5 45
i9-9900T 70
+56.2%

Core i9-9900T outperforms Xeon E3-1505M v5 by 56% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.49 8.55
Integrated graphics card 2.77 3.08
Recency 1 September 2015 23 April 2019
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 8 16
Cost $434 $439
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 35 Watt

The Core i9-9900T is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1505M v5 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1505M v5 is a mobile workstation processor while Core i9-9900T is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1505M v5 and Core i9-9900T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
Xeon E3-1505M v5
Intel Core i9-9900T
Core i9-9900T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 208 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1505M v5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 41 vote

Rate Core i9-9900T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1505M v5 or Core i9-9900T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.