Xeon E3-1505M v5 vs Core i9-9900K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-9900K
2018
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
11.73
+164%

Core i9-9900K outperforms Xeon E3-1505M v5 by a whopping 164% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-9900K and Xeon E3-1505M v5 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking6071253
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.800.27
Market segmentDesktop processorMobile workstation
SeriesCore i9 (Desktop)Intel Xeon E3
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-R (2018−2019)Skylake (2015−2016)
Release date19 October 2018 (5 years ago)1 September 2015 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$488$434
Current price$409 (0.8x MSRP)$1888 (4.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-9900K has 4641% better value for money than Xeon E3-1505M v5.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-9900K and Xeon E3-1505M v5 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)256 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)8 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size178 mm2122 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-9900K and Xeon E3-1505M v5 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA-1151FCBGA1440
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-9900K and Xeon E3-1505M v5. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP++
Smart Responseno data+
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Core i9-9900K and Xeon E3-1505M v5 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX++
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® MEYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-9900K and Xeon E3-1505M v5 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-9900K and Xeon E3-1505M v5. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size128 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth41.6 GB/s34.1 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 630Intel HD Graphics P530
Max video memory64 GB1.7 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHz1.05 GHz
InTru 3D++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i9-9900K and Xeon E3-1505M v5 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDPno data+
DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+
DVIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i9-9900K and Xeon E3-1505M v5 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support++
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304@24Hz4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304@60Hz4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2304@60Hz4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over VGAno dataN/A

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i9-9900K and Xeon E3-1505M v5 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.54.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-9900K and Xeon E3-1505M v5.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-9900K 11.73
+164%
Xeon E3-1505M v5 4.45

Core i9-9900K outperforms Xeon E3-1505M v5 by 164% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i9-9900K 18309
+164%
Xeon E3-1505M v5 6946

Core i9-9900K outperforms Xeon E3-1505M v5 by 164% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i9-9900K 1671
+42.9%
Xeon E3-1505M v5 1169

Core i9-9900K outperforms Xeon E3-1505M v5 by 43% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i9-9900K 7964
+123%
Xeon E3-1505M v5 3569

Core i9-9900K outperforms Xeon E3-1505M v5 by 123% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i9-9900K 7933
+42.7%
Xeon E3-1505M v5 5560

Core i9-9900K outperforms Xeon E3-1505M v5 by 43% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i9-9900K 48779
+128%
Xeon E3-1505M v5 21436

Core i9-9900K outperforms Xeon E3-1505M v5 by 128% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i9-9900K 14282
+103%
Xeon E3-1505M v5 7024

Core i9-9900K outperforms Xeon E3-1505M v5 by 103% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i9-9900K 3.58
+118%
Xeon E3-1505M v5 7.8

Xeon E3-1505M v5 outperforms Core i9-9900K by 118% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i9-9900K 21
+170%
Xeon E3-1505M v5 8

Core i9-9900K outperforms Xeon E3-1505M v5 by 170% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i9-9900K 1979
+173%
Xeon E3-1505M v5 725

Core i9-9900K outperforms Xeon E3-1505M v5 by 173% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i9-9900K 212
+34.6%
Xeon E3-1505M v5 158

Core i9-9900K outperforms Xeon E3-1505M v5 by 35% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i9-9900K 2.38
+33.7%
Xeon E3-1505M v5 1.78

Core i9-9900K outperforms Xeon E3-1505M v5 by 34% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i9-9900K 11.1
+181%
Xeon E3-1505M v5 4

Core i9-9900K outperforms Xeon E3-1505M v5 by 181% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i9-9900K 7633
+98.5%
Xeon E3-1505M v5 3846

Core i9-9900K outperforms Xeon E3-1505M v5 by 98% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i9-9900K 114
+154%
Xeon E3-1505M v5 45

Core i9-9900K outperforms Xeon E3-1505M v5 by 154% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i9-9900K 261
+56.9%
Xeon E3-1505M v5 166

Core i9-9900K outperforms Xeon E3-1505M v5 by 57% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.73 4.45
Integrated graphics card 3.08 2.78
Recency 19 October 2018 1 September 2015
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 8
Cost $488 $434
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 45 Watt

The Core i9-9900K is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1505M v5 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i9-9900K is a desktop processor while Xeon E3-1505M v5 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-9900K and Xeon E3-1505M v5, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-9900K
Core i9-9900K
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
Xeon E3-1505M v5

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 2192 votes

Rate Core i9-9900K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 209 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1505M v5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-9900K or Xeon E3-1505M v5, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.