A6-5400K vs Xeon E3-1240 v5

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1240 v5
2015
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
5.33
+550%

Xeon E3-1240 v5 outperforms A6-5400K by a whopping 550% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1240 v5 and A6-5400K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking11102498
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.610.02
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E3no data
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date19 October 2015 (8 years ago)2 October 2012 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$282no data
Current price$203 (0.7x MSRP)$163

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E3-1240 v5 has 17950% better value for money than A6-5400K.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1240 v5 and A6-5400K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache256 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size122 mm2246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data70 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1240 v5 and A6-5400K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1151,FCLGA2011FM2
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and A6-5400K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1240 v5 and A6-5400K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+no data
SGXYes with both Intel® SPS and Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and A6-5400K are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and A6-5400K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.1 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataRadeon HD 7540D

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and A6-5400K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4N/Ano data
Max resolution over eDPN/Ano data
Max resolution over DisplayPortN/Ano data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and A6-5400K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXN/Ano data
OpenGLN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and A6-5400K.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1240 v5 5.33
+550%
A6-5400K 0.82

Xeon E3-1240 v5 outperforms A6-5400K by 550% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E3-1240 v5 8251
+554%
A6-5400K 1262

Xeon E3-1240 v5 outperforms A6-5400K by 554% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E3-1240 v5 1291
+234%
A6-5400K 387

Xeon E3-1240 v5 outperforms A6-5400K by 234% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E3-1240 v5 4177
+700%
A6-5400K 522

Xeon E3-1240 v5 outperforms A6-5400K by 700% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.33 0.82
Recency 19 October 2015 2 October 2012
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 65 Watt

The Xeon E3-1240 v5 is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-5400K in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1240 v5 is a server/workstation processor while A6-5400K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1240 v5 and A6-5400K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5
Xeon E3-1240 v5
AMD A6-5400K
A6-5400K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 145 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1240 v5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 161 vote

Rate A6-5400K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1240 v5 or A6-5400K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.