A10-5700 vs Xeon E3-1240 v5

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1240 v5
2015
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
5.20
+201%
A10-5700
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.73

Xeon E3-1240 v5 outperforms A10-5700 by a whopping 201% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1240 v5 and A10-5700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11892032
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.75no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E3no data
Power efficiency6.152.52
Architecture codenameSkylake-DT (2015)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date19 October 2015 (9 years ago)2 October 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$282no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1240 v5 and A10-5700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size122 mm2246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data71 °C
Number of transistors1,750 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1240 v5 and A10-5700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA1151,FCLGA2011FM2
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and A10-5700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1240 v5 and A10-5700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
SGXYes with both Intel® SPS and Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and A10-5700 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and A10-5700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon HD 7660D

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and A10-5700 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4N/Ano data
Max resolution over eDPN/Ano data
Max resolution over DisplayPortN/Ano data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and A10-5700 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXN/Ano data
OpenGLN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and A10-5700.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1240 v5 5.20
+201%
A10-5700 1.73

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1240 v5 8254
+201%
A10-5700 2742

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E3-1240 v5 1319
+230%
A10-5700 400

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E3-1240 v5 4341
+332%
A10-5700 1004

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.20 1.73
Recency 19 October 2015 2 October 2012
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E3-1240 v5 has a 200.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

A10-5700, on the other hand, has 23.1% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E3-1240 v5 is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-5700 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1240 v5 is a server/workstation processor while A10-5700 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1240 v5 and A10-5700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5
Xeon E3-1240 v5
AMD A10-5700
A10-5700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 163 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1240 v5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 167 votes

Rate A10-5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1240 v5 or A10-5700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.