Celeron 857 vs Xeon E3-1240 v3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1240 v3 and Celeron 857 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1238not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.92no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameHaswell-WS (2013)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date2 June 2013 (11 years ago)1 July 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$300$134
Current price$78 (0.3x MSRP)$458 (3.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1240 v3 and Celeron 857 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.4 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus supportno data4 × 5 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache8192 KB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size160 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1240 v3 and Celeron 857 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1150FCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1240 v3 and Celeron 857. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMAno data+
AVX+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+no data
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
SIPP+no data
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Access++
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1240 v3 and Celeron 857 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+no data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1240 v3 and Celeron 857 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1240 v3 and Celeron 857. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s21.3 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1240 v3 and Celeron 857 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
eDPno data+
DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1240 v3 and Celeron 857.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E3-1240 v3 7068
+1142%
Celeron 857 569

Xeon E3-1240 v3 outperforms Celeron 857 by 1142% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 June 2013 1 July 2011
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Cost $300 $134
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 17 Watt

We couldn't decide between Xeon E3-1240 v3 and Celeron 857. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1240 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron 857 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1240 v3 and Celeron 857, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3
Xeon E3-1240 v3
Intel Celeron 857
Celeron 857

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 335 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1240 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Celeron 857 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1240 v3 or Celeron 857, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.