Celeron 857: specs and benchmarks

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 857
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.36

Celeron 857 provides poor benchmark performance at 0.36% of a leader's which is a 96-core EPYC 9655P.

Summary

Intel started Celeron 857 sales 1 July 2011 at a recommended price of $134. This is a Sandy Bridge architecture notebook processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 2 cores and 2 threads, and is based on 32 nm manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 1200 MHz and a locked multiplier.

Compatibility-wise, this is FCBGA1023 processor with a TDP of 17 Watt. It supports DDR3 memory.

Primary details

Celeron 857 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.

Place in the ranking3054
Place by popularitynot in top-100
Market segmentLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron
Power efficiency2.01of 100.00 (Ryzen Z1 Extreme)
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date1 July 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$134of 17,906 (Xeon Platinum 8280L)

Detailed specifications

Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)
Threads2
Base clock speed1.2 GHzof 4.7 GHz (Ryzen 9 7900X)
Boost clock speed1.2 GHzof 6.2 GHz (Core i9-14900KS)
Bus typeDMI 2.0
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplier12of 42 (Core i7-7700K)
L1 cache64K (per core)of 80 KB (EPYC 9965)
L2 cache256K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)of 1152 MB (EPYC 9684X)
Chip lithography32 nmof 3 nm (Core Ultra 9 285K)
Die size131 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cof 110 °C (Core Ultra 9 185H)
Number of transistors504 millionof 135,240 million (EPYC 9684X)
64 bit support+
Windows 11 compatibility-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 857 compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)of 8 (Xeon Platinum 8454H)
SocketFCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)17 Wattof 500 Watt (Xeon 6960P)

Technologies and extensions

Technological capabilities and additional instructions supported by Celeron 857. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
FMA+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+
My WiFi-
Turbo Boost Technology-
Hyper-Threading Technology-
Idle States+
Thermal Monitoring+
Flex Memory Access+
Demand Based Switching-
FDI+
Fast Memory Access+

Security technologies

Processor technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-
EDB+
Anti-Theft-

Virtualization technologies

Supported virtual machine optimization technologies. Some are specific to Intel only, some to AMD.

VT-d-
VT-x+
EPT+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by Celeron 857's memory controller. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequency may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3
Maximum memory size16 GBof 6 TiB (EPYC 9654)
Max memory channels2of 12 (Xeon Platinum 9221)
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sof 460.8 GB/s (EPYC 9654)

Graphics specifications

General parameters of a GPU integrated into Celeron 857.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel Processors
Clear Video HD-
Graphics max frequency1 GHz
InTru 3D-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 857's integrated GPU.

Number of displays supported2
eDP+
DisplayPort+
HDMI+
SDVO+
CRT+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection types of supported peripherals.

PCIe version2.0of 5.0 (EPYC 9655P)
PCI Express lanes16of 128 (EPYC 9655P)

Benchmark performance

Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of Celeron 857. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 857 0.36

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 857 569

Gaming performance

Closest competitors

Celeron 857's performance relative to its closest rivals among notebook CPUs.


AMD equivalent

According to our data, the closest AMD alternative to Celeron 857 is Athlon 64 X2 TK-42, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 5 positions in our ranking.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to Celeron 857:

E1-2500 102.78
Celeron 857 100
E1-6010 94.44

Similar processors

Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

Recommended GPUs

People consider these graphics cards to be good for Celeron 857, according to our PC configuration statistics.

These are the fastest graphics cards for Celeron 857 in our user configuration statistics. There is a total of 3 configurations using Celeron 857 in our database.

All comparisons with Celeron 857

Community ratings

Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Celeron 857 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 857, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.