Celeron G3900 vs Xeon E-2276M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E-2276M
2019
6 cores / 12 threads, 45 Watt
7.63
+441%

Xeon E-2276M outperforms Celeron G3900 by a whopping 441% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E-2276M and Celeron G3900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking8982120
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation28.110.18
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon EIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-H (2018−2019)Skylake (2015−2016)
Release date1 May 2019 (5 years ago)1 September 2015 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$450$42
Current price$230 (0.5x MSRP)$105 (2.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E-2276M has 15517% better value for money than Celeron G3900.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E-2276M and Celeron G3900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus supportno data4 × 8 GT/s
L1 cache384 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.5 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size149.6 mm2150 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data65 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E-2276M and Celeron G3900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1440FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt51 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E-2276M and Celeron G3900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+-
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon E-2276M and Celeron G3900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+-
Identity Protection+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E-2276M and Celeron G3900 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E-2276M and Celeron G3900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size128 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth41.8 GB/s34.1 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics P630Intel HD Graphics 510
Max video memory64 GB64 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHz950 MHz
InTru 3D++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E-2276M and Celeron G3900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVI++

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E-2276M and Celeron G3900 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support++
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@30Hz4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hz4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hz4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over VGAN/AN/A

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E-2276M and Celeron G3900 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.54.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E-2276M and Celeron G3900.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E-2276M 7.63
+441%
Celeron G3900 1.41

Xeon E-2276M outperforms Celeron G3900 by 441% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E-2276M 11795
+440%
Celeron G3900 2186

Xeon E-2276M outperforms Celeron G3900 by 440% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E-2276M 1426
+145%
Celeron G3900 582

Xeon E-2276M outperforms Celeron G3900 by 145% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E-2276M 5281
+431%
Celeron G3900 995

Xeon E-2276M outperforms Celeron G3900 by 431% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.63 1.41
Recency 1 May 2019 1 September 2015
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Cost $450 $42
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 51 Watt

The Xeon E-2276M is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G3900 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E-2276M is a mobile workstation processor while Celeron G3900 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E-2276M and Celeron G3900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E-2276M
Xeon E-2276M
Intel Celeron G3900
Celeron G3900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 52 votes

Rate Xeon E-2276M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 194 votes

Rate Celeron G3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E-2276M or Celeron G3900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.