Celeron M 420 vs Xeon E-2136

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E-2136 and Celeron M 420 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking826not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation19.36no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon ECeleron M
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake (2017−2019)Yonah (2005−2006)
Release date12 July 2018 (5 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$284no data
Current price$311 (1.1x MSRP)$145

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E-2136 and Celeron M 420 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads121
Base clock speed3.3 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/s533 MHz
L1 cache384 KBno data
L2 cache1.5 MBno data
L3 cache12 MB1 MB L2 KB
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage rangeno data1.0V-1.3V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E-2136 and Celeron M 420 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1151PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt27 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E-2136 and Celeron M 420. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+no data
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon E-2136 and Celeron M 420 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E-2136 and Celeron M 420 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E-2136 and Celeron M 420. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666no data
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth41.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E-2136 and Celeron M 420.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E-2136 13451
+9577%
Celeron M 420 139

Xeon E-2136 outperforms Celeron M 420 by 9577% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 6 1
Threads 12 1
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 27 Watt

We couldn't decide between Xeon E-2136 and Celeron M 420. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E-2136 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron M 420 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E-2136 and Celeron M 420, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E-2136
Xeon E-2136
Intel Celeron M 420
Celeron M 420

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 16 votes

Rate Xeon E-2136 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 80 votes

Rate Celeron M 420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E-2136 or Celeron M 420, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.