Celeron M 420: specs and benchmarks

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M 420
1 core / 1 thread, 27 Watt
0.09

Celeron M 420 provides poor benchmark performance at 0.09% of a leader's which is a 96-core EPYC 9655P.

Summary

This is an Yonah architecture notebook processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 1 core and 1 thread, and is based on 65 nm manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 1600 MHz and a locked multiplier.

Compatibility-wise, this is PPGA478 processor with a TDP of 27 Watt.

Primary details

Celeron M 420 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.

Place in the ranking3379
Place by popularitynot in top-100
Market segmentLaptop
SeriesCeleron M
Power efficiency0.32of 100.00 (Core Ultra 7 164U)
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)
Threads1
Base clock speed1.6 GHzof 4.7 GHz (FX-9590)
Boost clock speed1.6 GHzof 6.2 GHz (Core i9-14900KS)
Bus rate533 MHz
L3 cache1 MB L2 KBof 1152 MB (EPYC 9684X)
Chip lithography65 nmof 3 nm (Apple M3 Max 16-Core)
Maximum core temperature100 °Cof 110 °C (Atom x7-E3950)
64 bit support-
Windows 11 compatibility-
VID voltage range1.0V-1.3V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 420 compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)27 Wattof 3100 ‑ 4500 (Ryzen 7 7435H)

Technologies and extensions

Technological capabilities and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 420. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-
Turbo Boost Technology-
Hyper-Threading Technology-
Idle States-
Demand Based Switching-
FSB parity-

Security technologies

Processor technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-
EDB+

Virtualization technologies

Supported virtual machine optimization technologies. Some are specific to Intel only, some to AMD.

VT-x-

Benchmark performance

Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of Celeron M 420. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron M 420 0.09

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron M 420 139

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron M 420 1277

Gaming performance

Closest competitors

Celeron M 420's performance relative to its closest rivals among notebook CPUs.


Atom N435 111.11
Atom N270 100
Celeron M 420 100

AMD equivalent

According to our data, the closest AMD alternative to Celeron M 420 is C-30, which is faster by 22% and higher by 22 positions in our ranking.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to Celeron M 420:

V-Series V105 155.56
E-240 133.33
C-30 122.22
Celeron M 420 100

Similar processors

Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

Recommended GPUs

People consider these graphics cards to be good for Celeron M 420, according to our PC configuration statistics.

These are the fastest graphics cards for Celeron M 420 in our user configuration statistics. There is a total of 35 configurations using Celeron M 420 in our database.

RX 580 Radeon RX 580
2.9% (1/35)
GT 440 GeForce GT 440
2.9% (1/35)
9800 GT GeForce 9800 GT
2.9% (1/35)
HD Graphics 4000 HD Graphics 4000
2.9% (1/35)
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
8.6% (3/35)
HD Graphics HD Graphics
2.9% (1/35)
HD Graphics 2500 HD Graphics 2500
2.9% (1/35)
ATI HD 5450 Radeon HD 5450
2.9% (1/35)
GeForce 210 GeForce 210
5.7% (2/35)

All comparisons with Celeron M 420

Community ratings

Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.


4.2 81 vote

Rate Celeron M 420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 420, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.