EPYC 7H12 vs Xeon D-1602

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon D-1602
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 27 Watt
1.61
EPYC 7H12
2019
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
45.50
+2726%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Xeon D-1602 by a whopping 2726% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon D-1602 and EPYC 7H12 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking211346
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.51no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon DAMD EPYC
Power efficiency5.4414.82
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)18 September 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$106no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon D-1602 and EPYC 7H12 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads4128
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Multiplier2526
L1 cache128 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache3 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size246.24 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors3200 Million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon D-1602 and EPYC 7H12 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1667TR4
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-1602 and EPYC 7H12. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
QuickAssist-no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
GPIO+no data
AMTSPS 3.0no data
Quiet System-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon D-1602 and EPYC 7H12 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-1602 and EPYC 7H12 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-1602 and EPYC 7H12. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR3DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size128 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth34.124 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-1602 and EPYC 7H12.

PCIe version2.0/3.0no data
PCI Express lanes32no data
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports6no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports6no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon D-1602 1.61
EPYC 7H12 45.50
+2726%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon D-1602 2459
EPYC 7H12 69633
+2732%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.61 45.50
Recency 2 April 2019 18 September 2019
Physical cores 2 64
Threads 4 128
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 280 Watt

Xeon D-1602 has 937% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7H12, on the other hand, has a 2726.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 months, 3100% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7H12 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon D-1602 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-1602 and EPYC 7H12, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon D-1602
Xeon D-1602
AMD EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7H12

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-1602 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 450 votes

Rate EPYC 7H12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon D-1602 or EPYC 7H12, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.