EPYC 7H12 vs Xeon E5-2686 v4

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon E5-2686 v4
2016
18 cores / 36 threads
13.51
EPYC 7H12
2019
64 cores / 128 threads
45.03
+233%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Xeon E5-2686 v4 by 233% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Xeon E5-2686 v4 and EPYC 7H12 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking48839
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money32.095.02
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5AMD EPYC
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date20 June 2016 (7 years ago)18 September 2019 (4 years ago)
Current price$80 $6796

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2686 v4 has 539% better value for money than EPYC 7H12.

Technical specs

Xeon E5-2686 v4 and EPYC 7H12 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads36128
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus support2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
L1 cacheno data96K (per core)
L2 cache4.5 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache45 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size456.12 mm2192 mm2
Number of transistors7200 Million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2686 v4 and EPYC 7H12 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
Socketno dataTR4
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2686 v4 and EPYC 7H12. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2686 v4 and EPYC 7H12 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2686 v4 and EPYC 7H12 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2686 v4 and EPYC 7H12. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size1,536 GB4 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2686 v4 and EPYC 7H12.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2686 v4 13.51
EPYC 7H12 45.03
+233%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Xeon E5-2686 v4 by 233% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2686 v4 20893
EPYC 7H12 69633
+233%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Xeon E5-2686 v4 by 233% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 13.51 45.03
Recency 20 June 2016 18 September 2019
Physical cores 18 64
Threads 36 128
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 280 Watt

The EPYC 7H12 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2686 v4 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2686 v4 and EPYC 7H12, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2686 v4
Xeon E5-2686 v4
AMD EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7H12

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 173 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2686 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 450 votes

Rate EPYC 7H12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2686 v4 or EPYC 7H12, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.