Xeon Platinum 8358 vs D-1581

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon D-1581
2016
16 cores / 32 threads, 65 Watt
8.59
Xeon Platinum 8358
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 250 Watt
35.18
+310%

Platinum 8358 outperforms D-1581 by a whopping 310% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon D-1581 and Xeon Platinum 8358 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking83191
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.7311.92
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Dno data
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date24 February 2016 (8 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Current price$728 $4650

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Platinum 8358 has 337% better value for money than Xeon D-1581.

Detailed specifications

Xeon D-1581 and Xeon Platinum 8358 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads3264
Base clock speed1.8 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache1.5 MB (per core)48 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size306.18 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data81 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)80 °C81 °C
Number of transistors3,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon D-1581 and Xeon Platinum 8358 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA1667FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt250 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-1581 and Xeon Platinum 8358. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
GPIO+no data
StatusLaunchedLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon D-1581 and Xeon Platinum 8358 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-1581 and Xeon Platinum 8358 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-1581 and Xeon Platinum 8358. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size128 GB6 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth34.124 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-1581 and Xeon Platinum 8358.

PCIe version2.0/3.04.0
PCI Express lanes3264
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports6no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN+no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon D-1581 8.59
Xeon Platinum 8358 35.18
+310%

Platinum 8358 outperforms D-1581 by 310% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon D-1581 13282
Xeon Platinum 8358 54416
+310%

Platinum 8358 outperforms D-1581 by 310% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.59 35.18
Recency 24 February 2016 6 April 2021
Physical cores 16 32
Threads 32 64
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 250 Watt

The Xeon Platinum 8358 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon D-1581 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-1581 and Xeon Platinum 8358, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon D-1581
Xeon D-1581
Intel Xeon Platinum 8358
Xeon Platinum 8358

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 17 votes

Rate Xeon D-1581 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 7 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8358 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon D-1581 or Xeon Platinum 8358, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.