Xeon D-1581 vs E-2136

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E-2136
2018
6 cores / 12 threads, 80 Watt
8.47
+1.3%
Xeon D-1581
2016
16 cores / 32 threads, 65 Watt
8.36

Xeon E-2136 outperforms Xeon D-1581 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E-2136 and Xeon D-1581 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking890899
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation26.50no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon EIntel Xeon D
Power efficiency10.0212.17
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date12 July 2018 (6 years ago)24 February 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$289no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E-2136 and Xeon D-1581 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1232
Base clock speed3.3 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0DMI 2.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3318
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)1.5 MB (per core)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size154 mm2306.18 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data80 °C
Number of transistorsno data3,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E-2136 and Xeon D-1581 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1151FCBGA1667
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E-2136 and Xeon D-1581. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
GPIOno data+

Security technologies

Xeon E-2136 and Xeon D-1581 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E-2136 and Xeon D-1581 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E-2136 and Xeon D-1581. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4, DDR3
Maximum memory size128 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s34.124 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics P630no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E-2136 and Xeon D-1581.

PCIe version3.02.0/3.0
PCI Express lanes1624
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data6
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data+
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E-2136 8.47
+1.3%
Xeon D-1581 8.36

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E-2136 13460
+1.3%
Xeon D-1581 13282

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.47 8.36
Recency 12 July 2018 24 February 2016
Physical cores 6 16
Threads 12 32
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E-2136 has a 1.3% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 years.

Xeon D-1581, on the other hand, has 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads, and 23.1% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon E-2136 and Xeon D-1581.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E-2136 and Xeon D-1581, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E-2136
Xeon E-2136
Intel Xeon D-1581
Xeon D-1581

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 16 votes

Rate Xeon E-2136 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 17 votes

Rate Xeon D-1581 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E-2136 or Xeon D-1581, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.