A9-9425 vs Xeon D-1548

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon D-1548
2015
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
5.93
+231%

Xeon D-1548 outperforms A9-9425 by a whopping 231% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon D-1548 and A9-9425 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11232026
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.38no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon DAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency12.0210.88
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date1 November 2015 (9 years ago)31 May 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$555no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon D-1548 and A9-9425 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed2 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache512 KB128K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die size246.24 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)80 °C74 °C
Number of transistors3200 Million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon D-1548 and A9-9425 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1667FT4
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-1548 and A9-9425. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
GPIO+no data

Security technologies

Xeon D-1548 and A9-9425 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-1548 and A9-9425 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-1548 and A9-9425. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-1548 and A9-9425.

PCIe version2.0/3.0no data
PCI Express lanes24no data
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports6no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN+no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon D-1548 5.93
+231%
A9-9425 1.79

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon D-1548 9075
+500%
A9-9425 1513

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.93 1.79
Recency 1 November 2015 31 May 2016
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 15 Watt

Xeon D-1548 has a 231.3% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

A9-9425, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, and 200% lower power consumption.

The Xeon D-1548 is our recommended choice as it beats the A9-9425 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon D-1548 is a server/workstation processor while A9-9425 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-1548 and A9-9425, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon D-1548
Xeon D-1548
AMD A9-9425
A9-9425

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-1548 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1533 votes

Rate A9-9425 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon D-1548 or A9-9425, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.