Celeron E3500 vs Xeon D-1521

Aggregate performance score

Xeon D-1521
2015
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
3.58
+507%
Celeron E3500
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.59

Xeon D-1521 outperforms Celeron E3500 by a whopping 507% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon D-1521 and Celeron E3500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15092801
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.602.99
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon Dno data
Power efficiency7.530.86
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Wolfdale (2008−2010)
Release date1 November 2015 (9 years ago)29 August 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199$62

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron E3500 has 15% better value for money than Xeon D-1521.

Detailed specifications

Xeon D-1521 and Celeron E3500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz2.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (shared)
L3 cache1.5 MB (per core)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size246.24 mm282 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data74 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)80 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,200 million228 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon D-1521 and Celeron E3500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1667LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-1521 and Celeron E3500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
GPIO+no data

Security technologies

Xeon D-1521 and Celeron E3500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-1521 and Celeron E3500 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-1521 and Celeron E3500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.124 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-1521 and Celeron E3500.

PCIe version2.0/3.02.0
PCI Express lanes24no data
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports6no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN+no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon D-1521 3.58
+507%
Celeron E3500 0.59

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon D-1521 5690
+509%
Celeron E3500 935

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.58 0.59
Recency 1 November 2015 29 August 2010
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon D-1521 has a 506.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 44.4% lower power consumption.

The Xeon D-1521 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron E3500 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon D-1521 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron E3500 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-1521 and Celeron E3500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon D-1521
Xeon D-1521
Intel Celeron E3500
Celeron E3500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 2 votes

Rate Xeon D-1521 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 27 votes

Rate Celeron E3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon D-1521 or Celeron E3500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.